-
RETAINED VALUE
On another thread the discussion morphed into one of older coaches being undervalued considering miles of life left in them. We all take the position our Prevost chassis life expectancy is at the least in the high 6 figures. That is not unreasonable when some seated coaches have mileage significantly over a million miles, and entertainer coaches can easily have a million miles when they are retired.
Who exactly is it in our little section of the bus world that has the greatest impact on driving values down, based more on age rather than remaining life? It could be converters who want to sell new conversions, and thus need to create a perceived need by suggesting the coach value somehow represents its remaining life, probability of problems and lack of the latest features. Or is it the owners who always want that new coach smell, and therefore aren’t too concerned about what they get for a trade. Or is it the buying public that is used to conventional RVs, their lack of longevity and ever increasing age related problems?
It is crystal clear some features have a great deal of value. Let’s pretend we currently own a well maintained 40 foot conversion with an 8V92 DDEC II engine. Regardless of what we think its value is to buyers we do know that to upgrade we are going to spend some money. As long as we are pretending let’s say the 40 foot coach has 250,000 miles, and that represents 25% of its useful life.
Since we want to upgrade, we have a lot of options. First we want 45 feet. How much is that worth? We want to replace the 8V92 that gets 5.0 MPG, and drinks oil, with a Series 60 that gets 7.5 MPG and uses no oil between changes. That is a real value, but what is that worth?
We can get the upgrades mentioned above and it is likely the technology will not be much different than the 40 footer. No Crestron, nothing but switches, relays, and circuit breakers. Maybe the inverters will be a little bigger, but that is about it. Can anyone justify maybe as much as $50,000 greater value for a different engine and 5 feet more length?
Let’s keep pretending. We also want slides. Prevost slides. Now we have to step up to a H or XLII from the original rivet coach. Technology now starts to become evident. A greater number of coaches are going to have a converter installed control system like a Crestron, the chassis will be more complex, and the slides are going to make it seem like a huge step up. Are slides going to be worth perhaps another $50,000 to $100,000? Or is it likely part of the jump in value is the coach is going to have only about 125,000 miles or 12% of its useful life used up?
Continuing on up the list of coaches, their features, and technology we realize Prevost is greatly increasing chassis features. The brakes are all disc, multiplex wiring is introduced, and the slides have been improved to become “pinless”. But is there anyone buying these coaches deciding to replace its older counterpart to get these feature? As nice as some of the features are, such as fire suppression, a better message center, adaptive braking, etc now the conversion is more technical, but not a lot different than what was available in the 40 footer, yet everyday one of us spends maybe a couple hundred thousand to get a newer coach. Why? Has the older one lost any capabilities? Is it becoming a used up maintenance nightmare? We all brag about ours being million mile coaches, yet we dump them when the odometer passes 99,999.9.
Maybe the answer is we have to accept how our coach values change over time, because no converter is going to sell a new coach unless someone buys the new buyer’s old coach, and his old coach is likely to be bought by someone upgrading from a older coach, etc.
Log in to reply.